MSX3 is already available!

What's wrong, and why?

I've seen the licensing certificate. So? What does that have to do with what I said?

Ok, so I was wrong, and the copyright of the MSX BIOS used to belong to ASCII, so it's now an asset of the MSX Licensing Corporation.

And now that's out of the way, this is how this conversation should have happened:

Me: "Microsoft still owns the copyright of the MSX-BASIC interpreter and probably (correct me if I'm wrong) the MSX BIOS."
You: "No, ASCII used to own the copyright of the MSX BIOS."
Me: "Oh, I was wrong about that. Thanks."

See how easy it was? If it had happened that way I would have been happy you corrected me. Instead, you chose to act like a kindergartener and my impression of you isn't as good as it could have been.

But since version developed by Korean MSX fan Plaire, SCREEN 9 can also be used on non-Korean MSX2 (and higher) computers, including therefore the Japanese MSX2 (and higher) computers.

Dude, calm down. Let's use a bit of logic here:

1) The question in point was who owned the MSX-BASIC interpreter and the MSX BIOS.
2) The licensing certificate says that AGE Labs has a license to use, distribute and modify some assets owned by the MSX Licensing Corporation.
3) The licensing certificate doesn't say anything about whether the MSX Licensing Corporation owns the MSX-BASIC interpreter or the MSX BIOS.
4) Therefore, the license certificate is irrelevant to this point.

On the other hand, if you think you know more than I do about Mr. Nishi, ASCII Corporation or the MSX Association then you're wrong.